<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Reason and Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bhakticollective.com/2008/12/03/on-reason-and-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bhakticollective.com/2008/12/03/on-reason-and-love/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://bhakticollective.com/2008/12/03/on-reason-and-love/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhakticollective.com/?p=610#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>As an undergraduate, I did a lengthy study of the great Anglo-catholic thinker (and bhakta) John Henry Newman. Here is a sermon where he argues for similar principles. Admittedly, the older English takes a minute to get used to, but the sermon is brilliant.

http://www.newmanreader.org/works/oxford/sermon4.html

My hunch is that Bhaktivinoda, like Newman, also would say that there are also important things over which reason holds sway, and which would be distorted, should Love enter in appropriately. One does not, Newman notes, follow love alone to solve a mathematical problem. And frankly, this kind of mistake may lead to some of the short-sightedness and lack of rational discourse amongst many religious communities.

That said, in the light of modern rationalism and cheap enlightenment-style critiques of religious epistemology, Bhaktivinoda and Newman's warnings are salutary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an undergraduate, I did a lengthy study of the great Anglo-catholic thinker (and bhakta) John Henry Newman. Here is a sermon where he argues for similar principles. Admittedly, the older English takes a minute to get used to, but the sermon is brilliant.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newmanreader.org/works/oxford/sermon4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newmanreader.org/works/oxford/sermon4.html</a></p>
<p>My hunch is that Bhaktivinoda, like Newman, also would say that there are also important things over which reason holds sway, and which would be distorted, should Love enter in appropriately. One does not, Newman notes, follow love alone to solve a mathematical problem. And frankly, this kind of mistake may lead to some of the short-sightedness and lack of rational discourse amongst many religious communities.</p>
<p>That said, in the light of modern rationalism and cheap enlightenment-style critiques of religious epistemology, Bhaktivinoda and Newman&#8217;s warnings are salutary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
